What constructive criticism can you give to the presenter (e.g., would should have been included/excluded, make sure to address 'concepts' convered in the paper and relate how they were covered by the presenter).Does it have an impact - is it still relevant? Why is it worth reading.What are the strength and weaknesses of their solution?.What is their approach and how is it original and innovative? (original - compare it against contemporary approaches).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |